On 12/03/2015 06:10, Savageduck wrote:
> On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck
> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> said:
>>
>> On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>> On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>>> On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
>>>>> news:aoWdnc5YZdYcfmfJnZ2dnUU7-dsAAAAA@giganews.com...
>>>>>> On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take care:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/dubai-british-plane-spotters-arrested-uae-national-security-claims
>>>>>>
>
> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ricardo.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
>>>>> problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
>>>>> have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
>>>>> plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example.
>>>>> Many
>>>>> years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
>>>>> forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military
>>>>> aircraft
>>>>> in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
>>>>> significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
>>>>> injunction.
>>>>
>>>> Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
>>>> closely at AMS.
>>>
>>> Oops! Lets try that again.
>>
>> I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
>> here is attempt #3.
>> If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
>> final try.
> Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
> ...and here is that final try:
>
>
>
>> <image>
>
>
That's a dramatic picture - great stuff. It was worth the wait.
;-)
--
Moving Things In Still Pictures
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|
')){kind=link}