In article <2g5cldhqgfsp6vgcs3nat1eduvt7blarlm@4ax.com>, not my real pseudonym
says...
>
>On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 06:57:36 -0700, Stormin' Norman
><norman@schwarzkopf.in.memorium> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 00:19:13 -0700, "Bob (not my real pseudonym)"
>><invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 16:55:15 -0700, Stormin' Norman
>>><norman@schwarzkopf.in.memorium> wrote:
>>>
>Trump is, at the very best, cringeworthy. But he is the duly elected
>president; his one saving grace being that he is not HRC, who managed
>to become the one Democrat even Trump couldn't lose to.
>
>Saying offensive things in inappropriate locations does not often
>convince anyone to see your point. Adding hyperbole and untruth to
>those offensive things will convince even fewer, and likely end up
>enhancing the opposing position. Do you think you have changed the
>mind of even one person here?
>
>There are methods laid out in law for removing a politician that is
>guilty of malfeasance. If those don't suffice, you are left with the
>choice of tantrum, or illegality. Neither end well.
This is USENET, Bob...not a courtroom. Speaking one's mind (tantrum) is the
rule and if it offends someone...that's just "frosting on the cake".
You'll prolly learn that during your second year of law school...or maybe after
a few remedial courses from you first year.
...but Hey!...keep plugging away at it.
*
|
|