Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Stormin' Norman <norman@schwarzkopf.in.memorium>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Short Stirling... - b-17 entry.jpg
Message-ID: <c5nsjd9grjho5folumcv9kc1ak47opk7qj@4ax.com>
References: <phig5i01dl1@drn.newsguy.com> <llmqjdh1k5mbfa20124dis4l7o9500a063@4ax.com> <phjpi60mrb@drn.newsguy.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 45
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 11:04:44 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 2268
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1238630796
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:7848
On 4 Jul 2018 17:42:46 -0700, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
wrote:
>In article <llmqjdh1k5mbfa20124dis4l7o9500a063@4ax.com>, Stormin' Norman says...
>>
>>On 4 Jul 2018 05:56:18 -0700, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>From your post:
>>
>>"There were several incidents in which heavily damaged aircraft, such
>>as one Stirling which suffered a head-on collision with a
>>Messerschmitt Bf 109 fighter over Hamburg, were able to continue
>>flying and safely return to base."
>>
>>
>>An impressive aircraft.
>>
>
>FWIW, the only entry way in that I see is the door in front of the tail...then I
>guess it's a crawl or hunched walk up to the cockpit...and since it's a tail
>dragger, the cockpit seats must be at least 17 or 18 feet up...considerably
>higher than a B-17.
>
>
I believe you are correct about the entry door, although there were
several escape hatches for the pilots and crew. I wonder what the
engineering rationalization was for making these aircraft so high at
the nose?
I happened across a video which shows the crew entering and walking
around in the fuselage:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aC-vhYHbhgE
--
"Reluctantly I have concluded that President Trump is a serious threat to US
national security. He is refusing to protect vital US interests from active
Russian attacks. It is apparent that he is for some unknown reason under the
sway of Mr Putin."
-Barry R McCaffrey, Gen (ret) U.S.Army
|
|
){kind=link}