Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Graham Harrison <edward.harrisom.one@btinternet.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Big birds at Oshkosh
Message-ID: <n48qqclb77das2easufm5tfshegmbchn90@4ax.com>
References: <r4WdnW5dJOmqwzHEnZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@supernews.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 45
X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 09:48:31 UTC
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 10:48:04 +0100
X-Received-Bytes: 1892
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1511658402
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:6443
On Sun, 3 Sep 2017 14:40:37 -0500, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:
>Assuming flaps down, 8 engines, a 200 foot line-up distance and no wind, a
>maxed-out B-52H (488,000 lbs brake release gross weight) at 500 feet
>pressure altitude, OAT of 60 degrees F on a level, dry runway should have a
>takeoff ground run of approximately 8000 feet
>
>8,002 x 150 ft. runway
>
>B-52 landing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CL-JK6HPAuU
> takeoff: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fQpTwo8lsQ
>
>B-1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8prqKnnpbbc
>
>SR-71: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDTECZShylA
>
>Now you know why airports with runways exceeding 8,000 ft. were considered
>nuclear targets during the Cold War...
>
>
There's a story, which I cannot verify, that the RAF took a Vulcan
across the Atlantic to a bombing competition. They watched the B52s
lumber away and decided a bet was in order. I don't know what
base/how long the runway but the bet was that a fully loaded Vulcan
could make 5000 feet altitude over the "far" end of the runway from a
standing start. The Vulcan won (I think a case of good whisky).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
|