| 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:04:29 -0500
 From: Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
 Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
 Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:04:30 -0700
 Message-ID: <2017082513043070933-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
 References: <C6adnZkiOMRvwgHEnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@supernews.com> <oni3ug01ili@drn.newsguy.com> <dcCdnUh05bVozALEnZ2dnUU7-RHNnZ2d@supernews.com> <onnlt901499@drn.newsguy.com> <rJWdnWS6cNoS-z3EnZ2dnUU7-RPNnZ2d@supernews.com>
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
 Subject: Re: Welsh airlift ends in crash (1949)
 User-Agent: Unison/1.8.1
 Lines: 68
 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
 X-Trace: sv3-4cD4Z53VHAcgxkUhnLCqL7L0zoHewBZejEfZ41QsHRi+uNdOBSXahzJp5XQB4qoiia9JoicPOo7tAqP!rf5zK5knlsSuTtipJRLTRtJvIfIXRrLDONchsmhEq5zLO/YH7LiKjmKa495nYV5zlvcP7scN7Vk5!Lvc=
 X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
 X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
 X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 X-Original-Bytes: 4315
 X-Received-Bytes: 4437
 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2261987431
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:6413
 
 On 2017-08-25 18:03:55 +0000, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> said:
 
 > "Miloch"  wrote in message news:onnlt901499@drn.newsguy.com...
 >
 > In article <dcCdnUh05bVozALEnZ2dnUU7-RHNnZ2d@supernews.com>, Byker says...
 >>
 >> "Miloch"  wrote in message news:oni3ug01ili@drn.newsguy.com...
 >>>
 >>> Flying rule of thumb:
 >>>
 >>> "Anytime you can walk away from a landing...it was a good landing".
 >>
 >> After seeing so many crashes attributable to tail rotor failure, I wonder
 >> why there aren't more twin-rotor manufacturers, like Kaman and Kamov?
 >
 > Interesting observation:
 >
 > "The US uses tandem rotor helicopters because they are easier to make
 > and maintain; its biggest requirement is a sophisticated transmission
 > design that needs to be placed between the two rotors to ensure they
 > rotate evenly and the blades never intersect (even when one engine
 > fails).
 >
 > "Co-axial helicopters are much harder to make and the entire engine and
 > rotor design is extremely mechanically complex.
 >
 > "Just building a regular engine axel is difficult, and the finished
 > axel is virtually impossible to inspect for internal voids or cracks.
 > Any internal defects will result in a catastrophic failure when the
 > engines spins up to speed the first time. Even now, many turbine engine
 > manufacturers do their first engine start in something that looks like
 > a giant steel bunker because there's just no way to be sure the axel at
 > the heart of that engine won't explode; literally explode. You want to
 > make axels that go inside axels and spin in opposite directions? That's
 > a lot harder...
 >
 > "Personally, I have no idea why Russia chose such a complex and
 > difficult to manufacture helicopter design. Igor Markov may be able to
 > explain the logic behind that decision. He is very knowledgeable about
 > Russia and has written some of my favorite Quora answers about that
 > part of the world. I'm sure there is a reason; I just don't know it.
 >
 > "Personally, it reminds me of the Russian booster rocket designs from
 > the race to the moon. The US built the Saturn V stage 1 rocket with
 > five engines that had to fire simultaneously and equally. The Russians
 > designed the N1 lunar rocket that contained 30 (smaller) engines in
 > stage 1 that had to fire simultaneously and equally. The Americans got
 > the the moon first (in part) because it's much easier to control and
 > balance 5 engines simultaneously than it is to control and balance 30
 > simultaneously."
 >
 > https://www.quora.com/Why-hasnt-Russia-commercially-produced-any-tandem-rotor-helicopter-and-USA-any-co-axial-rotor-helicopter
 
 I
 >
 don't believe the K-Max K-1200 is dependant on a co-axial system, but
 uses an inter-meshing "eggbeater" dual rotor.
 <http://www.kaman.com/aerosystems/solutions/air-vehicles-mro/k-max>
 <http://fireaviation.com/tag/k-max/>
 <http://www.flyingmag.com/aircraft/helicopters/kaman-restarting-k-max-k-1200-production>
 <https://youtu.be/4dJyUFgY0a8>
 --
 
 
 Regards,
 
 Savageduck
 
 
 | 
 
 |