Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Jess Lurkin <123@321.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: UK2 WG143 BoultonPaul BalliolT2.jpg
Date: 3 Nov 2014 19:22:30 GMT
Organization: Whose Company?
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <m38klm12l2i@news6.newsguy.com>
References: <qbac5aprprlbb2mgmqhsmenbkrm09esmpa@4ax.com> <GqednejF8ZoZXMrJnZ2dnUU7-S2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pd696b18d696b28a2f37a2580cae5372236a5e9ea7d33d639.newsdawg.com
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2747146283
X-Received-Bytes: 1134
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:526
patricia@school.study wrote in news:GqednejF8ZoZXMrJnZ2dnUU7-
S2dnZ2d@giganews.com:
> Ouch! Again another example of British engineers making another ugly
> aircraft.
Thank You. I've said the same several times.
The U.S. is not immune to bouts of ugly birds,
but unlike the Brits, more the exception than
rule.
For the most part, Hawker is the U.K. exception.
Never seen an ugly Hawker. Bi-planes included.
(The jury is deadlocked on the Hurricane)
|
|
){kind=link}