Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:35:42 -0600
From: R2D2 <alfa@bravo.co>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Second Russian jet crashes in failed carrier landing near Syria
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 19:35:40 +0000
Message-ID: <ev2e4cdsd2mqqlcr9aakv5sto6s843og7g@4ax.com>
References: <o248ps04n1@drn.newsguy.com> <bagb4chjkcjq38bm9l0nhfn31lq53pgk4p@4ax.com> <o24ndq0vhr@drn.newsguy.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 35
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-d1L4kmjibEcyti5JRlABf5ehh8k8DuvZng5gd5XHzoXjcnNq1VlNsxUyFsVg+14Dxx3TQdbmAQstkIp!SvetYwbvC70rLj91rrSN9JJdMvAX92qn+hRnD1V93erdPRakdffjxUsB69ira1LkhuF271c=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2623
X-Received-Body-CRC: 349095954
X-Received-Bytes: 2898
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:5113
On 5 Dec 2016 13:49:46 -0800, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
wrote:
>In article <bagb4chjkcjq38bm9l0nhfn31lq53pgk4p@4ax.com>, R2D2 says...
>>
>>On 5 Dec 2016 09:40:12 -0800, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/second-russian-jet-crashes-in-failed-carrier-landing-near-syria/ar-AAl9Lqp?li=BBnb7Kz
>>>
>>>Russia's defence ministry said Monday a Sukhoi jet fell into the sea after a
>>>malfunction as it tried to land on the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier
>>>following a bombing raid in Syria.
>>>
>>>It was the second such crash involving Russia's lone carrier in a month, since
>>>it arrived in the eastern Mediterranean to bolster Moscow's airpower in Syria.
>>>
>>
>>Welcome to the wonderfull, DANGEROUS world of carrier flying. I bet
>>the chinese are playing very close atention...
>
>
>I'd trust the wealthy Chinese who can afford to replace landing cables in a
>timely fashion rather than the poor Russians who are sailing a rusting, oil
>fired hulk of an aircraft carrier with a short-handed poorly trained crew.
>
>If the Russian Navy can't keep their toilets flushing and semi-operable, you
>can't expect them to land their aircraft in a safe manner.
>
>...just sayin'
>
I was thinking more in terms of actual hands-on experience. The
chinese carrier maybe fully restored/almost new, but they have zero
experience. And, no matter the training and/or gear, untill you
actually start to use it...
|
|