| 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail From: Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
 Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
 Subject: Re: Boeing B-29 Superfortress pics [04/20]
 Date: 23 Sep 2016 10:06:06 -0700
 Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
 Lines: 20
 Message-ID: <ns3ndu01tj1@drn.newsguy.com>
 References: <ns1ved01nmq@drn.newsguy.com> <kcr9ubhmnll9coitsteqep0trfrqt55dc1@4ax.com>
 NNTP-Posting-Host: p9eebe8a935216fd71cbbf2455ad801fc9604c248fd14f8d3.newsdawg.com
 User-Agent: Direct Read News 5.60
 X-Received-Bytes: 1129
 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2414262187
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:4626
 
 In article <kcr9ubhmnll9coitsteqep0trfrqt55dc1@4ax.com>, not my real pseudonym
 says...
 >
 >
 >Out of its cocoon...
 >
 >http://museumofflight.org/aircraft/boeing-b-29-superfortress
 
 
 It was the B-2 bomber of its day...unlike the B-17s of 10 years earlier, you
 could wear (if you wanted) a short sleeve shirt (instead of fleece-lined
 leather), didn't need to wear an oxygen mask (fully pressurized), had no open
 windows so no cold air blowing in...was faster with longer range.
 
 ...what am I leaving out?
 
 
 
 *
 
 
 | 
 
 |