| 
| Re: Rosie, pt 6 - Rosie 71.jpg (1/1) - 2 attachments | Easynews - www.easynews. .. |  | Charles Lindbergh (spirit@stlouis.com) | 2016/09/03 08:58 |  | 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail From: Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.com>
 Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
 Subject: Re: Rosie, pt 6 - Rosie 71.jpg (1/1) - 2 attachments
 Message-ID: <86plsbt3h2jllc5drmlqpt4lhko4h6eiln@4ax.com>
 References: <XnsA670479EA9105noemailattnet@216.166.97.131> <ik9esb5pur10bb1vistnopceobb081lpgd@4ax.com> <XnsA675AA1458180johnszalayattnet@216.166.97.131> <mekgsb5en4shab351di4mmjhrhei9pf0u9@4ax.com> <XnsA6769ADCA6A6johnszalayattnet@216.166.97.131>
 User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.00.32.1200
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 Lines: 56
 X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
 Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
 X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
 Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 14:58:20 +0000
 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1375368098
 X-Received-Bytes: 2847
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:4497
 
 On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 14:13:27 -0500, john Szalay <john.szalayatatt.net>
 wrote:
 
 >Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in
 >news:mekgsb5en4shab351di4mmjhrhei9pf0u9@4ax.com:
 >
 >> On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:43:11 -0500, john Szalay <john.szalayatatt.net>
 >> wrote:
 >>
 >>>Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in
 >>>news:ik9esb5pur10bb1vistnopceobb081lpgd@4ax.com:
 >>>
 >>>> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:07:13 -0500, Mitchell Holman
 >>>> <noemail@comcast.net> wrote:
 >>>>
 >>>> This is a tough one, I think she might be working on the tail
 >>>> assembly of a Martin Mariner.  At first I thought it was a PBY, but
 >>>> it just doesn't look right.
 >>>
 >>>PBY tail
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> foot pegs, fillit to the horizontal stabilizer  and access panels
 >>> match to
 >>>PBY ,   as does the US Navy logo location ( for the time period )
 >>>
 >>
 >> Do you have a link to whatever reference material you used to come to
 >> your conclusion?  I would enjoy reviewing it.
 >>
 >>
 >
 >http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/oem2002007105/PP/resource/
 >
 >http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/oem2002005578/PP/
 >
 >http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/oem2002005571/PP/
 >
 >http://cdn.loc.gov/service/pnp/fsac/1a34000/1a34800/1a34884v.jpg
 >
 >http://www.gstatic.com/hostedimg/5e3cda2a07043acb_large
 >
 >http://www.gstatic.com/hostedimg/0edf6c7e6312e146_large
 >
 >http://www.gstatic.com/hostedimg/7e723e0c6a3b2364_large
 >
 >http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/fsa1992000919/PP/
 >
 >http://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/fsa.8b04593/
 >
 >
 >
 >http://images.google.com/hosted/life/0edf6c7e6312e146.html
 
 Good job, thanks for posting.  Looks like my first reaction was the
 correct one and of course, you were right.
 
 | 
 
 |  |