Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Bob (not my real pseudonym)" <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Dorsal excrescence
Message-ID: <jkheobp8edic0k8ae8belh6gruhuls6kgi@4ax.com>
References: <0001HW.D3AC7F4D00190111B03139BF@news-europe.giganews.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 15
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 01:05:20 -0700
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2150876064
X-Received-Bytes: 1586
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:4107
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 23:29:17 +0100, Netko <Someone.not@this.address>
wrote:
>The 737 MAX which has been flying at Farnborough this week has a lump on its
>back, arrowed in the upper part of the attached picture. I assume this is a
>fairing for the Ku-Band antenna. However, it seems a retrograde step when
>compared with the streamlined design on the aircraft as originally rolled out
>(lower part of the picture).
>
>Anyone know why the change was made?
I'm not convinced there is a difference - looks more like different
perspectives of the same shape. The factory shot sideview doesn't
show the width of the more-or-less constant cross-section of the dome.
|
|