On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:08:08 -0800, "Bob (not my real pseudonym)"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 12:37:38 +0000, R2D2 <alfa@bravo.co> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:19:02 -0600, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Odd. It worked just fine on dry land a few weeks ago
>>
>>Hang on.. it has only 3 legs? That's a dangerously unstable
>>configuration...
>
>Four legs, but it appears that as it tips on two, they collapse.
>
>http://www.space.com/29770-spacex-cargo-launch-reusable-rocket-test.html
They really should put 5 or 6. It would make it a lot easier to
compensate for any tiny movement...
|
|