Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in
news:scentahh6pjnqdgiq532gt3evul3bo171n@4ax.com:
> On 25 Aug 2015 00:05:16 GMT, Jess Lurkin <NiceGuy@34576.com> wrote:
>
>>Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in
>>news:v28ntalneoj94pqlbt2getg9al0p5rftm7@4ax.com:
>>
>>> Probably a wise decision.
>>>
>>> http://www.seattlepi.com/news/world/article/Police-fear-air-show-cras
>>> h- toll-could-rise-to-20-6461458.php#photo-8508029
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> http://bit.ly/1IahRqp
>>>
>>
>>Not at all! Flybys/flyovers should go on just to keep
>>the birds healthy. That acrobatic stuff with some of
>>the 50+ year old birds (and maybe a few drivers) needs
>>to go. My vote is to keep on keeping on. Safely.
>
> I have no doubt the pilot and the organizers felt what they did with
> the Hunter was safe.
>
> From what I read, the curbs are on older aircraft performing high
> energy maneuvers at airshows.
>
> No matter how much I love aircraft, I cannot justify the death of 10
> innocents and one pilot for the sake of entertainment.
>
Who can justify any deaths? I'm not ready to start walking
to work because there are over 33k road deaths every year.
High energy maneuvers? That is what I am saying. Fly overs
aren't that at all. Aerobatic stunts with 50+ year old birds
(and maybe a few drivers) needs to go - or at least somewhat
regulated. My vote is to keep on keeping on. Safely.
But I repeat myself. Cheers sir.
|
|