| 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail From: Jess Lurkin <NiceGuy@4578.com>
 Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
 Subject: Re: Real or faked?
 Date: 19 Aug 2015 18:04:16 GMT
 Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
 Lines: 29
 Message-ID: <mr2gf002fkf@news4.newsguy.com>
 References: <BNWdnaZJaoSCbE7InZ2dnUU7-SOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 NNTP-Posting-Host: pac752f35f83407bb80db1d9708825026228460674a95449b.newsdawg.com
 User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1933240862
 X-Received-Bytes: 1631
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:2343
 
 "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote in
 news:BNWdnaZJaoSCbE7InZ2dnUU7-SOdnZ2d@earthlink.com:
 
 > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
 > reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 >
 > Bing translation: "Simply cool: June 4, 1965 Mr. Valentin Privalov
 
 
 My money is on fake. And I'll give odds. Very little about
 this looks right ro me.
 
 Angles of the jet in relation to the water and bridge,
 The blurring of the water in relation to the jet,
 The amount of water displaced and "adhering" to the jet,
 The water disturbances that far forward of splash
 
 BUT MAINLY -
 
 It is a Soviet picture! These clowns have been doctoring
 pictures before the revolution in 1916-17. This looks to
 me like a picture of a jackalope or that 20lb grasshopper.
 
 As a kid of the 50's - I can remember how most of the pics
 coming outta the Soviet bloc had weird looks/sheens to 'em.
 They could take a simple picture of the Moon over Moscow
 and I'd get out my loupe.
 
 
 
 | 
 
 |