A Corsair was my first thought too, it is fairly long, but it is to narrow
for a cCorsair and the nose ring doesn't look right to me either.
Claus
"Savageduck" skrev i meddelelsen
news:2014070315514320633-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
On 2014-07-03 18:43:07 +0000, "Claus Gustafsen" <claus@gustafsen.nu> said:
> I agree, but the third picture shows a blue nosesection of what looks like
> a single seater, but most likely is something like a Harvard/Texan which
> can be mistaken for a fighter.
>
> Claus
Shot #3 looks to be a cockpit shot of the B-25. However, shot #5
appears to be not so much an AT-6 but an F4U Corsair, and that would
certainly qualify it as a WWII fighter. One some industrious group of
individuals should consider restoring.
> "Savageduck" skrev i meddelelsen
> news:2014063017481324884-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
>
> On 2014-06-30 23:06:24 +0000, "Conscious Pilate"
> <unkbrunk@optusnet.com.au> said:
>
>> G'day All,
>>
>> this very interesting set of pictures from an interesting site in Ohio
>>
>> see ya
>>
>> Conscious Pilate
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/howaboutthat/10935544/In-pictures-World-War-II-fighter-aircraft-rot-in-abandoned-plane-graveyard.html
That
#1
>>
> shot sure doesn't look like any WWII fighter I know.
> The B-25 isn't a fighter, and that F-86 sure isn't WWII vintage.
--
Regards,
Savageduck
---
Denne e-mail er fri for virus og malware fordi avast! Antivirus beskyttelse er aktiveret.
http://www.avast.com
|
|