Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Bob (not my real pseudonym)" <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: UK2 XD322 Supermarine Scimitar 1965-12 HMSArkRoyal.jpg
Message-ID: <pfguja9net5ffd7qn3v1ca7btdpqf9ikgh@4ax.com>
References: <8v0nja5h7a63a47fa16slvc7dnaj5h237j@4ax.com> <McmdnfJIhvgXE6PInZ2dnUVZ5qudnZ2d@giganews.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 9
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 01:17:31 -0700
X-Received-Body-CRC: 531760641
X-Received-Bytes: 1414
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:1521
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:31:27 GMT, patricia@school.study wrote:
>The sit down, nose up take off was because the elevators did not have enough
>authority to quickly rotate the nose to maximum lift angle of attack. That
>means without the nose up to start, it would hit the water before a correct
>climb attitude could be achieved. The F4 needed a boast nose strut to do
>the same thing.
Did they figure that out the hard way with the Scimitar?
|
|
){kind=link}