Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Old Rhinebeck, concluded - Old Rhinebeck 96.jpg (1/1)
Message-ID: <rfbsjaprcjslj2kdadg4539kfpqmubsumk@4ax.com>
References: <XnsA488476DF4CFAnoemailattnet@216.166.97.131> <0e3qjad7of10egp3rlbmqnndsc5314euru@4ax.com> <XnsA4894999CC357noemailattnet@216.166.97.131>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
X-No-Archive: YES
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-No-Record: YES
Lines: 22
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:39:52 +0000
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3509343570
X-Received-Bytes: 1823
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:1514
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 07:12:43 -0500, Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> wrote:
>Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in
>news:0e3qjad7of10egp3rlbmqnndsc5314euru@4ax.com:
>
>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 06:59:55 -0500, Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Mitchell, thanks for posting the Rhinebeck pictures, they bring back
>> fond memories.
>>
>> While there, did you determine if most of the WWI aircraft being flown
>> were reproductions? Hard to believe they would be flying originals.
>>
>
>
> All the flying models are reproductions, IIRC.
>The originals are in the museum. These machines were
>fragile enough went built, and have only gotten more
>brittle with age.
Yes, that was my impression as well, again, thanks for the posts.
|
|
')){kind=link}