Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Jess Lurkin <Good@Guy.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: The Learning Curve
Date: 28 Mar 2015 03:20:12 GMT
Organization: Good Company
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <mf56lc02o4d@news4.newsguy.com>
References: <XvydndJxouYPiYvInZ2dnUU7-Y8AAAAA@earthlink.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p81b5ff91c147d5142766674c61c0d28df43223818a708a5e.newsdawg.com
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3373423794
X-Received-Bytes: 1551
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:1239
"Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote in
news:XvydndJxouYPiYvInZ2dnUU7-Y8AAAAA@earthlink.com:
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
Because of that darned pole, I'm having the hardest time figuring
the trajectory. I'm thinking left wing tip touched first with the
fuselage at a right 45 degree angle to the ground, relative to the
picture. The craft then rocked onto the nose, then the fuselage
started seeking it's usual state of rest, R. wing hitting the pole
as it rocked down and back.
BUT WAIT! What about that tree limb?
I'm thinking there has to be a lot of sliding, almost to the point
of a cartwheel.
Anyone else?
(Forgive me please. I used to do accident reconstruction in a prior
life. But those were EASY! They were automobiles! 2D versus 3D!)
Thanks again to Byker. OBTW - I thanked him earlier in another group.
|
|