Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border1.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
From: EAX <eax@less.than>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.picture.ls-series
Subject: Re: 1 file<2 EAX>"Pics_888.csv" yEnc (0/1) - LS-Magazine.com-Issue09(Final)_n@@dles_905.csv [0/1]
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:28:20 +0000
Organization: none
Message-ID: <cnrkq4lblchia2sio83ef5stsctc5bj9s9@4ax.com>
References: <5ZOdnQjbCOWXZDrUnZ2dnUVZ8jiWnZ2d@giganews.com> <sg0gq4dpc7q81l6kkaud7g9shhlmg0li74@4ax.com> <ordgq419lplruhh36irvkoo693058p94hp@4ax.com> <zridnQOMjp472zXUnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@aviteo.de> <gtjgq4hvej7m391cia0itmpo8i402upk4b@4ax.com> <c7mgq49f31jkfph6eo0ladq78jmkhe1nkr@4ax.com> <38tgq4dulcqrj5rkjciq45fljtv4jnom07@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 29
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2d2d3abc.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC==4QYA04WgBnNIa8EGN3lWcL?0kYOcDh@jlG1]Ca@BbMj`IFm3eE[fiiLdj:059d6mhO[m3aPgO=:c:c4N`7@GL3c
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.picture.ls-series:578
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 02:20:24 +0300, Servic <servic02@mt2009.com>
wrote:
>>Servic, csv you posted is the part of big bourne's csv for all
>>LS-Magazine issues. I have all the files which match your csv, but I
>>need more time to compare n@@dles' and bourne's csv for lsm09 in order
>>to say which of them is correct.
>EAX, I made selective comparison my lsm09 with bourne's
>LS-Magazine.csv. Really lsm09 what I have is identical to bourne's
>csv. So far as I know only 1 LS-Magazine site was in existence. Whose
>csv is correct?
I have finished comparison. lsm09 differs from the other lsm issues.
It has 590 images which are similar to the images in the other lsm
issues (the images have SOF0 marker - Baseline DCT) and 298 images
which are not similar (the images have SOF2 marker - Progressive DCT).
Almost all images which are of size 1440x960 have SOF0 marker (except
3 images) and almost all images which are of size 960x1440 have SOF2
marker (except 3 images). I don't know for sure whether progressive
images had been issued by LS or they had been retouched later by
someone else, but I think the first case takes place. For example, all
the images in Little-Virgins series are progressive too.
So, which csv is correct for lsm09? The answer is n@@dles'. Probably
someone used a program to strip metadata from jpeg files. If we remove
APP12 (Ducky) and APP14 (Adobe) segments from all lsm09 images
matching n@@dles' csv we got images matching bourne's csv. Exactly and
with no exceptions. All the images in the other lsm issues have Ducky
and Adobe segments.
|
|