On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:01:42 -0600, "mr.bill" <mrbill@invalid.lss>
wrote:
>On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:10:54 +0300, Servic wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:11:20 +0000, EAX <eax@less.than> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:30:34 -0600, servic02@mt2009.com (servic)
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>I didn't understand what mr.bill means saying 'You must have gotten some
>>>>remakes.' ??re is my csv.
>>>
>>>This is not n@@dles'. Try to use n@@dles' csv for lsm09.
>>EAX, this is csv of the lsm09 images what I have, but not n@@dles'
>>csv.
>
>Servic,
>
>The csv you have was made from files that are not original. Your files are
>probably okay. Here's n@@dles' csv to check with.
Mr.bill, I have n@@dles' csv for lsm09. But according to this csv my
images (Pics_888.csv) are not correct. For instance:
lsm-001-001.jpg,281478,A235F37D - in Pics_888.csv (my collection),
lsm-001-001.jpg,281513,FD0C0564 - in n@@dles' csv.
lsm-001-002.jpg,293391,4E4E00B1 - in Pics_888.csv (my collection),
lsm-001-002.jpg,293426,38B75500 - in n@@dles' csv...
and so on.
Do you suppose that are identical files?
Servic
|
|