On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:21:42 +0000, EAX wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:07:07 -0600, "mr.bill" <mrbill@invalid.lss>
>wrote:
>
>>My thoughts at first were to rename images reissued as 'a' and 'b', but
>>that really complicates things, and neither copy carries the real name.
>>My current thinking is to create a separate folder for 'deprecated' LS
>>images and put all the old copies there. That way, serious collectors
>>could have all legitimate LS issued images without messing up the
>>viewing folder with duplicate images where the models's eyes are covered
>>with a logo for example, or the image is upside-down.
>
>I have the same opinion. Each collection should have a separate
>directory for additional files which are authentic but undesirable to
>stay in the main directories along with other files, because such
>files can spoil the impression of viewing collection.
>
>I think the following files should be always moved to the separate
>directory:
>
>1) old versions of re-logoed pictures;
>2) corrupt pictures even if they were corrupt on the site;
>3) thumbnails for missing pictures.
>
>Each file in the separate directory should be commented in csv.
>
>So I would move the corrupt copy of lod-074-064.jpg to the separate
>directory and replace it with a good copy from UN.
Thanks for your input on the subject.
mr.bill
|
|