Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!indigo.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!mauve.octanews.net!nx02.iad.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.140.MISMATCH!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:25:58 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.picture.ls-series
Subject: Re: <n@@dles> All of your Shining-Pretties fills 1543 files - "ps-021b-063.jpg" yEnc (2/2)
From: "n@@dles" <n@@dles>
References: <LYCdnb9N8ckZ0PTUnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@gonamic.de> <jOWdnbGTkMi6qffUnZ2dnUVZ8qydnZ2d@gonamic.de> <6mfkm499etvgm7vvablfa6nol7k9663huc@4ax.com> <Xns9B90D0C26A782ndles@216.196.109.131> <496a7e12$0$31163$450c70f1@news.privacy.li>
Message-ID: <Xns9B9145BF5733ndles@216.196.109.131>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:25:58 -0600
Lines: 34
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-1h23gUpa9r0hNyDHOOT6D3OeX6/OyjLA4KLBKtczQcxYHk+jidAAL031yO7cDCDOZxHmwLtDEhyzZoi!qswxkWxonZAqxgQwo7UWmEOdJuKidTrrYzcdiF8ArPa6fR6c6gM530x/hTFyAg==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.picture.ls-series:411
>>
> n@@dles, you have the eyes of an eagle. I like things nice and
> orderly and it is taking every ounce of my being to keep myself from
> renaming them to what I would like to see them be. Alas, every
> pristine source I have for LS-Barbie has had the space before the
> '.jpg' for the sets prefixed lsrar-.
>
> Sources are an eMule archive by "NM" and a compleat usenet post by
> Emmie Lover on or about 30Sept2007 to the removed group.
>
> The same is true for the one Shining Pretties set. The space was put
> there by LS as near as I can tell. It seems unlikely separate rippers
> would rename the same few sets identically. When I see renaming, it's
> usually to preserve a pattern that matches other sets rather than to
> make one set stand out as an oddball.
>
> Best guess from my end would be the guy resizing the images and adding
> the logos typed (or rather mis-typed) the name of the first image.
> Then with each additional save, instead of re-typing the whole thing
> he just clicks once on the prior image which puts its name in the
> filename box, then he highlights and changes 1 to 2, then 2 to 3, etc.
> with each additional image preserving the original typing mistake all
> through the set.
>
yeh thats what i was thinking. its happened before so its not surprising
:)
Regards
n@@dles
|
|