On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:56:42 -0600, "n@@dles" <n@@dles> wrote:
>A T Tappman wrote in news:5nfam4pn3ududninf8a6qequo6m5ufindg@4ax.com:
>
>> On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:45:56 -0500, A T Tappman wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:20:41 -0600, "n@@dles" <n@@dles> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm going to post three images for you that meet Count Draculol's
>>>>> csv but fail yours. I believe them all authentic and would like to
>>>>> offer them for your examination. The 2 un- images carry a 2002
>>>>> date stamp which makes it unlikely they are a backward rename from
>>>>> the not-yet-published Old Story set. The third is from LS Magazine
>>>>> issue 02.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>With regards to the 2 un images - I agree completely. I checked the
>>>>headers and my versions do not match the rest of the set whereas
>>>>yours do. It is likely that my versions have come from old story set
>>>>:(
>>>>
>>>>I am going to replace mine with yours - good job sir :)
>>>>
>>>>My copy of the lsm image is corrupt thats why i included the thumb
>>>>along with it. This looks like the good version :) Headers match,
>>>>etc.
>>>>
>>>>I'll replace this and remove the thumb.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers
>>>>n@@dles
>>>
>>>n@@dles,
>>>
>>>Not to seem obtuse, but is this file supposed to be password
>>>protected?
>>>
>>>If so, in a word, "help".
>>>
>>>TIA
>> n@@dles,
>>
>> Oops. Password question relates to your "miss.rar" file.
>
>I assume you got the passwd?? If not it was in my other reply to mr. bill
>:)
>
>Cheers
>n@@dles
Got it, thanks. I missed that message the first time through.
|
|