Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border1.newsrouter.astraweb.com!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!216.40.30.110.MISMATCH!novia!novia!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.gonamic.de!news.gonamic.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:21:36 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.picture.ls-series
Subject: Re: Ping - Mr Bill - ? --- LS Land bible of CSVs - LS Land Bible.rar 00 file
From: "mr.bill" <mrbill@invalid.lss>
Organization: Saturday Night Live
References: <490ca6ab$0$25280$6c36adad@news.usenetserver.com> <490e4fe0$0$31764$450c70f1@news.privacy.li> <mpSdnTMxHPhpn7fUnZ2dneKdnZzinZ2d@gonamic.de> <Xns9B8B4DC50431Dndles@216.196.109.131> <56qdnafiIcj8vvnUnZ2dnUVZ8uudnZ2d@gonamic.de> <Xns9B8CAD0EF4253ndles@216.196.109.131>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Message-ID: <ZIGdnZnRY67_EPjUnZ2dnUVZ8uCdnZ2d@gonamic.de>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:21:38 -0600
Lines: 102
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-V6O0JOA4TRqYbYM3Hn185i47SxwYuhNFRe5v3hC9FMwSwgLvWDwCadz8iq/e9XQ3IDK6eqrvH6N0rae!k6+hYmiE1TzeW54finhKtBsStynpRs+CEIm90dbo8xcVqe+U+u1NXiApzFWhGLr7rKDfMX7Qm37g!UG+ufFBtsp0bqdjWkNPutwn7xmO3
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenext.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@usenext.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
X-Original-Bytes: 5140
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.picture.ls-series:380
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:00:49 -0600, n@@dles wrote:
>> n@@dles,
>>
>> It's never too late to enter the convo. My work is ongoing; so is the
>> work of EAX.
>>
>
>I noticed EAX's work in the other group - great job - i know how much
>hassle it can been :(
>
>> Is your work still open to revision? I do have some questions then if
>> possible.
>>
>> My first queries would concern the naming of Ukrainian Nymphets set 35
>> in your csvs "Ukrainian-Nymphets.com(Final)_n@@dles_10280.csv" and
>> "Ukrainian-Nymphets.com-Lovely-Nymphets.com(Final)_n@@dles_19900.csv".
>> Both show all files in set 35 suffixed with "_0".
>>
>
>Yeh - i noticed that when i was creating the csv - total pain because it
>looks like a suffix XNews would add on downloading.
>
>I ripped the site myself tho and thats how they where named - i never
>rename files from original so left them that way for the csv.
>
>> I presume this resulted from a naming clash with the similarly named
>> Ukrainian Angels set.
>>
>
>It could have been - seems fairly likely as ua-35 is the first with the un
>prefix. I am positive the mistake was at the LS side tho and not after the
>rip.
>
>> My second question would be about the naming difference of Ukrainian
>> Angels set 39 when viewed in "Ukrainian-Angels.com(Final)
>> _n@@dles_9737.csv" versus "Ukrainian-Angels.com-Gentle-Angels.info
>> (Final)_n@@dles_19081.csv".
>>
>> My intent here is not to resurrect the the ua-/un- naming controversy
>> for UA sets 33 thru 39. There are two camps. Both feel strongly.
>> And whichever side we come down on will not make the others files go
>> away. We will have these UA sets by both names forever. I would like
>> to see consistency in both your csvs if possible. As it now stands,
>> one csv lists the set as ua-39-nnn, while the other lists it as
>> un-39-nnn. I have gone with un- in my own csv.
>>
>
>Weird - I just checked my master copies of the csvs and they both have the
>set listed with the un prefix.
>I have no idea how that could have happened since both csvs are obviously
>made from the same collection.
>
>The original prefix is def un. Its back to ua at set 40.
>
>Ive attached the csvs for you to check.
>
>
>> A few of the files you have indexed have never made it to usenet or
>> p2p. Are you safe to post? For example, two sets are currently being
>> posted by others with permanent gaps that you may be able to fill.
>>
>> Sgt.Pepper is posting Lovely Nymphets and ln-196-21tn.jpg is lacking
>> from everyone's collection.
>>
>> Michalrodent has begun posting LS Girls and everyone lacks the same 8
>> files, lsg-61-121 thru 128.
>>
>
>Done. RAR = miss.rar Pass = LS-miss
>
>> There are other missing LS images of course, but this what is needed
>> at present.
>>
>> I'm going to post three images for you that meet Count Draculol's csv
>> but fail yours. I believe them all authentic and would like to offer
>> them for your examination. The 2 un- images carry a 2002 date stamp
>> which makes it unlikely they are a backward rename from the
>> not-yet-published Old Story set. The third is from LS Magazine issue
>> 02.
>>
>
>Just looking at these now.
>
>Regards
>n@@dles
>
Wow! Thanks a mint, n@@dles. That finishes a couple series for a lot of
us. I had searched high and low for those pics. Not even placeholders
existed for the LS Girls images.
I checked the dates on your ua- csv and on my copy. Mine carries a one day
newer date. On closer examination, there has been additional text added up
top. I have never altered one of your csv's, but apparently someone did and
reposted it the next day ;-( I'll replace my altered copy with your
original.
Might I have any LS you need?
--
mr.bill
|
|