On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:02:01 GMT, Sgt.Pepper@StrawberryFields.Forever wrote:
> Last year I got the LS-Land-23 post on a.b.ls. I used the bourne csv and
> that set was missing an image , I checked the crc32 of the un-074-064 and
> it matched so I used it. But I still have the originial that was posted
> along with the files the checker rejected (lod-074_IsItReal,
> lod-074_DarkElf.sfv and, lod-074.par2s) By chance I forgot to delete all
> that stuff, I'm glad I forgot.
I'm getting the feeling that bourne was consistently "correcting mistakes"
made by LS. This isn't the only instance. Another was in renaming one
video in LS Land issue18 from p_03.avi to p_02.avi. I know it was an
oversight. I know it should have rightfully been named p_02. It wasn't,
and correcting it after the fact only adds another layer of confusion to
unravel when trying to come to some semblance of truth.
I noticed too that bourne renumbered all the videos in LS Land issue01 to
run sequentially.
It's a run of tendencies like this that make it easier to say he probably
just renamed un-74-064 to get a good clean image in that one spot. I've got
that same image in my collection too, but I named it lod-074-064r. And I
don't include it in my csv.
In truth, I would have allowed his version of LS Land issue23 into the bible
(with an explanation) had he not inadvertently overlooked one other image in
the series.
--
mr.bill
|
|