On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:16:26 -0800, Hugh Morris <jfvavrek@comcast.net>
wrote:
>On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 09:27:43 -0800, Edsel Ford <EdselFord@Chevy.gov>
>wrote:
>
>>There are a lot of really good WAH sets (not many vids) of gals that
>>have been posted in pubes by Gollum and Lazarus 2 to 3 years ago. Some
>>in high def some in low def.
>>
>>I've been trying to do searches to avoid duplication of sets - vids I
>>don't worry about cuz there were so few posted.
>>
>>Do ppl care?? If I didn't have to search for dups it would make life
>>easier and maybe I could post more sets when I do post.
>>
>>I guess the question is: Are there enough new folks here who don't
>>have the ability to go back 2 or 3 years for downloads; or enough
>>folks who don't care about the dups. All my posts are in HiDef. A lot
>>of the posts from gollum were in medium def - if that matters to any
>>one?
>>
>>And to any folks who thanked me and I missed you to say you're welcome
>>- well You Are Welcome!
>>
>>Keep the comments on the posts comining if you want to maintain my
>>interest in posting. I'm sorry, but I get bored real easy :).
>>
>>I got my main system back up. Dell put in a new SSD but I could only
>>find a good full backup from sept. So I'm still catching up on getting
>>some of my tools caught up. All my downloads are on extenal USB hard
>>drives, so nothing was lost there :).
>
>I've seen a few sets that I already D/L'd but the sets you're posting
>are much higher def, so don't worry about avoiding duplicates, they're
>better sets overall.
>
>Thanks!
ur welcome
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|