On 9 Feb 2015 22:29:08 GMT, AJ Jr <InDeep@MyHouse.Com> wrote:
>SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8 (SL) wrote in news:54d531a6$0$24635$b1db1813
>$46decd27@news.astraweb.com:
>
>>
>> Just so everyone here knows, I haven't switched groups. It's
>> just that I can find more posts for this group lately than for .pubes...
>> easily 5-to-1! And I just can't populate two groups with equal fur.
>> I just can't.
>> 2014 was definitely the year of the half-bush. Unless I become
>> a personal manager for the stars we're just going to have to deal
>> with it. It is what it is. I do see it as an improvement though! Don't
>> you?
All fine by me
I am not sure how to define it but some girls have 'bush', whether
they are shaved or not. Josie bush queen for instance. I can watch her
whether full plumage or shaved.
>> If I were asked my preference, instead of the little triangles I'd
>> rather see mohawks.
Overall, yes. But I think it depends on the girl. And her bush,
whether it has been shaved or not.
> Back in the 70's, Playboy came out with a
>> little book named something ike "Pocket Playmates". Remember
>> now, bushes were in full-swing; any amount of shaving was new.
>> There was a model from South Florida who was mohawked, dark
>> tan-lined(she'd only been wearing a bottom)...and for the amount
>> of time I spent holding that up with one hand... She was laying
>> back in a papasan chair too. Anyone else remember her?
>>
>
>Is this who you're looking for?
>
>AJ Jr.
>
>PS I don't care where you post as long as you keep posting! Much
>Appreciated!
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.nospam.female.bodyhair/4918', 'Re: Melissa Rose_hc [001of314] - "serpentdx266-01.jpg" yEnc (0/1) 338067 bytes - - 1 attachment (1/2)')){kind=link}