On 26 Jan 2016 18:05:27 GMT, schwarz peter <user@localhost.tld> wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 22:49:12 -0600, SL wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 07:10:44 -0600, Rick O
>> <20081231@onolanke.router5.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 26 Dec 2015 20:52:20 GMT, SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8 (SL) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Now do you remember her?
>>>
>>>Yep.
>>
>> Lovely, lovely breasts and a cunt that looks like she's been
>> going at it with a belt-sander. :-/
>
>eye of the beholder, etc. i think i remember seeing a note somewhere
>recently where you (SL) were saying you don't care the smooth look and
>that you prefer "interesting" labia minora. as for me, the plump, smooth
>peach, the "innie" (as i call it), with the labia minora hidden, is the
>breathtaking feminine ideal; some examples (and some of my favorites) are
>mia sollis, avia/lizzie ryan/lucie moricka, emily bloom, miela/marry
>queen, macy/jubia, vittoria, averotica's celesta, perla, connie carter,
>and yes, now, sanita.
>
I soon as I read that, Lizzy Ryan came immediately to mind!
>i guess what i want to say is two things: one, that there are those of us
>who love the smooth look and two, thank you for posting them even though
>they may not be your personal preference.
>
>with sincere gratitude,
>
>schwarzpeter
>
...speaking of the same, I used to avoid her just because of
that. You just can't deny her beauty though. I'd still choose to
hold it against me, err,...I mean her. ;-)
Looks tight!
|
|
 ---> Rick O [01of75] - "serpentdx2410-01.jpg" yEnc (0/1) 480144 bytes -')){kind=link}