In article <part1of1.1.ghDh034m3N3m2Q@ue.ph>, Hank wrote:
> Samurai <samurai@pagoda.org> wrote:
> >In article <cnagaa9sss1n4v0ime39b9n24vo7f1iicj@4ax.com>, rebar
> ><rebar@rbar.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I second that. Fake as hell.
> >>
> >> On 03 Jan 2015 09:17:46 GMT, yeright <yeright@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >at least mention its a photoshop fake...
> >>
> >
> >
> >In article <XnsA3FE981F84A3namcardcom@69.16.179.23>, Frank Dracman
> ><oblivion@thetet.net> wrote:
> >
> >> begin 644 s253-033_sam_b_2.jpg
> >
> >
> >
> >I got some pregger fakes I did a while back. I'll have to dig them up
> >and post them to fill in the down time here. Ha ha!
> >
> >Samurai
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >
> >Well I did mention that I had some fakes in and earlier post and I was
> >going to look for them. Also the file name has been changed and I have
> >the Christina Restoration Project on it so of course it's a fake. But
> >yes I guess I should have mentioned again that it's a fake so as not to
> >upset and mislead the hopeful.
> >
> >I apologize.
> >
> >Samurai
>
> I haven't seen this in any collection so I thought I'd share what I found...
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ioa1S-WdoiU
>
> Hank
Thanks! I've seen this one but it's nice to see again. And on prudish
YT, interesting. Certainly shows her great lower section which I always
felt was every bit as nice as her upper. Christina was made for loving.
There are a bunch of old Christinas on xhamster. Some nice comps
someone put together.
Samurai
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.nospam.christinamodel/452', 'Re: "s834-053_sam.jpg" I found them - This was new to me when I found it...')){kind=link}