Samurai <samurai@pagoda.org> wrote:
>In article <cnagaa9sss1n4v0ime39b9n24vo7f1iicj@4ax.com>, rebar
><rebar@rbar.com> wrote:
>
>> I second that. Fake as hell.
>>
>> On 03 Jan 2015 09:17:46 GMT, yeright <yeright@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >at least mention its a photoshop fake...
>>
>
>
>In article <XnsA3FE981F84A3namcardcom@69.16.179.23>, Frank Dracman
><oblivion@thetet.net> wrote:
>
>> begin 644 s253-033_sam_b_2.jpg
>
>
>
>I got some pregger fakes I did a while back. I'll have to dig them up
>and post them to fill in the down time here. Ha ha!
>
>Samurai
>
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>Well I did mention that I had some fakes in and earlier post and I was
>going to look for them. Also the file name has been changed and I have
>the Christina Restoration Project on it so of course it's a fake. But
>yes I guess I should have mentioned again that it's a fake so as not to
>upset and mislead the hopeful.
>
>I apologize.
>
>Samurai
I haven't seen this in any collection so I thought I'd share what I found...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ioa1S-WdoiU
Hank
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.nospam.christinamodel/450', 'Re: "s834-053_sam.jpg" I found them - This was new to me when I found it...')){kind=link}