Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 10:47:05 -0500
From: rebar <rebar@rbar.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.nospam.christinamodel
Subject: Re: The New Adventures of Old Christina (sigh)
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 11:46:58 -0400
Message-ID: <sg4fu9lorvcep8i9bsa2p7uuusu7fipral@4ax.com>
References: <6fb7u95o08udbbtgtgn4qof73k2k2auspd@4ax.com> <ql78u9t8o3c1e8squqenq6699fef2th1o4@4ax.com> <2pe8u9pmeb2q9sv5j6marducs7h9hvfcio@4ax.com> <cns9u915p48b3atj8spmlos4gcaauqd9eg@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 40
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-CfWlmCsFckpfqitsiVkQhfgEvMfoX0hUayH55uONKC7U3gx02RqCb3F3d9i3KX1L9xNXchUJjocUv+Y!pCHR2WsuNORe00gGSlI+u0zEpCJEwvhAkBmjesnZ94Qy0K6QrZpu0nJlDw6OZddJWogEQ/xM
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2877
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2933002124
X-Received-Bytes: 3130
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.nospam.christinamodel:251
I probably should have said IF she starts a new site, but her
"current" site and her Twitter posts both say she's got a new one
coming soon. It will have to be either cast out material or preggo
pics for now. The preggo stuff will get a niche crowd if she goes that
route, but once the baby is born, we'll see how well she can juggle a
porn career and raising a newborn - not to mention losing the baby
fat.
On Fri, 08 Aug 2014 10:59:56 -0500, Flatlander <flatlander47@cox.net>
wrote:
>You think there's actually going to be a new site? I expect the
>issue is that the current site isn't generating a lot of revenue
>anymore. Hard to tell what the webmaster is getting for material. It
>may be a lot of sets that aren't any good. After a lot of activity,
>she's disappeared from Twitter again. It takes two to argue. I'm
>sure there are issues on both sides.
>
>Still, we can be hopeful things will continue on and content will
>improve.
>
>On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 22:52:35 -0400, rebar <rebar@rbar.com> wrote:
>
>>Makes sense. I can't see her shooting something genuinely new for a
>>site that's closing down in two weeks. I just hope she starts her new
>>site with fresh material.
>>
>>On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 20:51:04 -0400, cc@cereal.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 12:50:44 -0400, rebar <rebar@rbar.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>As expected, her "New Set" looks to be about 1 to 2 years old.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for the upload though, Iam
>>>
>>>Could be. Didn't the web "master" say there were some leftover
>>>photosets (assuming they were shot a while back but initially
>>>rejected)?
|
|