Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.nospam.breasts.natural:4012
Path: news.nzbot.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer04.fr7!futter-mich.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx09.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <part1of1.1.N5zuG4PBjYiV9g@ue.ph>
Subject: Re: Do nipple piercings disqualify as "breasts natural"? Asking for a friend ;-)
From: cbwa <vienna@sausage.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.nospam.breasts.natural
References: <part1of1.1.ibLP8OHXA4TF5Q@ue.ph> <p9uneetg7fs836tqch4gj85mcfr3svfn2l@4ax.com>
User-Agent: Usenet Explorer/v5.6.1 http://www.usenetexplorer.com
Lines: 24
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 17:11:30 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 1974
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1847150145
Danny <notREALLY@buffoon.com> wrote:
>I think "breasts natural" refers to "not augmented" wherein the
>breasts themselves have not been modified internally with implants
>that change the shape and/or size of the breasts.
>
>Piercings do not change the size or shape and are therefore simply
>ornamental.
>
>So no, I don't think piercings disqualify.
>
>Personally I find peircings rather sexy and appealing. I find tattoes
>applied directly on the breasts or around them less appealing to the
>point of distracting. But that's just my personal taste. In general.
>I find small tats more attaractive than larger ones and plain designs
>and symbols much more attractive than pictures, especially those
>depicting the darker side of human expression.
Thanks for your reply Danny. I stumbled upon a treasure trove of Suicide
Girls and,
as you can see from the Trinidad posts, some are exceptionally beautiful. A
significant number
of the models are sporting nipple piercings, so, in the interest of keeping
quality at a
higher level here, I thought I would post a question to the group.
|
|