On 11 Jun 2016 08:50:42 -0700, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
wrote:
>In article <XnsA62456F952346bgmailc@69.16.179.38>, dr. who? says...
>>
>>Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com> wrote in
>>news:njfl050veo@drn.newsguy.com:
>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>> *
>>>
>>> begin 644 pml.16.06.09.hitomi.the.miracle.of.hitomi.mp4_thumbs_.jpg
>>>
>>> Attachment decoded:
>>> pml.16.06.09.hitomi.the.miracle.of.hitomi.mp4_thumbs_.jpg `
>>> end
>>>
>>
>>Thanks for the preview
>>d.w?
>
>Don't know why he previews using just a 10 second clip...it doesn't give any
>idea of what the entire vid is about.
>
>Prefer the jpg style and they alot quicker to make and show snippets from
>beginning to end.
>
>I kill-filed him ages ago because of his flooding and only did the Hitomi vid as
>a one time DL.
>
>Anyway...you really can't find fault with a consistant poster and he is that.
>
>
>
>
>
>go Warriors
Hi Miloch and the Good Doctor Who...
Well, as for RoboCock "he" is consistent and a prolific poster, with
most files titled in an understandable naming convention/format. But
then there is the scads of material that isn't for me. I do burn
through a lot of bandwidth and D/L much that immediately gets deleted
after a quick step through of the vids. Jpeg previews would certainly
be helpful and better than 10 secs or so of title and intro content.
So my PC spends hours, and I dump much/most of that in the minutes I
look at the posts I had preselected...
My usual highest level of content "validation" has been the "stars"
name, but most of the ones I knew, and liked, seemed to have vanished
in the last six to nine months. I've generally settled in for my
interests on the PML (porn mega load) and such intro characters and
words and weed through that storm of mostly dreck to pick out a few
pearls for a view. Not efficient. But "Hitomi" stood out! <smile>
And Miloch, thanks for posting the Jpeg for the folks here... I'll
NiZuB or shout a pointer every now and then. I've done this at times
without D/L'ing or previewing at times so excuse the occaisional
stinker. Down Boy! ... Not the kind one would "tinker" with kind of
stinker <wink>
BUT then he (it? RoboCock, after all...) does post, so I don't
complain. ...much <grin>
Spermy
<O=~~~~~~~
|
|