Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:32:36 -0500
From: Spermy Tonsilgloss <spermeister@boobonicplague.cum>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.nospam.breasts.natural.multimedia
Subject: Re: Heads up Val fans
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:32:42 -0400
Organization: Uncle Spermy's Fine Pearly Products
Message-ID: <2n3ooa5nruog3juih52sgu0ittii86meah@4ax.com>
References: <vvbhoad2untrus02q6sm3i9ubtpr25u4u3@4ax.com> <obihoad2nv5qf6n7k9cndin7st75ehe10q@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 37
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-6ochgqaMB9R0lvY23g4rr88pAZP2LuMTyiqGfkZp5F8B4ppwGMI3/E9O4X1LYQ3UQ6QkOdP45/V8+IE!FcZ3hBGx/wpgjopmKAS3THIBLIhv69+YEKAkxS9QYGMpnU7LuMLmxHmXIrALbzkX2MqRKw==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2529
X-Received-Bytes: 2766
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3688352578
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.nospam.breasts.natural.multimedia:522
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:52:39 -0400, sleazoid@sleaze.net wrote:
>On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:03:46 -0400, Spermy Tonsilgloss
><spermeister@boobonicplague.cum> wrote:
>
>>She has a Cosmid "interview" vid on ABE by RoboCock today.
>>
>>Aside for being spectacular, it's "meh" as it is mostly talk, clothes
>>don't come off until the very end.
>>
>>So have at it Valory hounds!
>>
>>Spermy
>><O=~~~~~~~
>
>I'm not optimistic, but it's nice that she's doing a vid with another
>company, even if it is Cosmid. Lately their stuff is getting better,
>still I doubt we'll ever see anything again like her "tugs" video.
>
>Sleazoid
Agreed, now that she's established herself somewhat as a "star".
But then, I don't care too much to see other guy's dicks in chicks
that I like fantasizing about, so for my particular bent, some twat
shots and fingering/vibe/dildoing does the trick. Definitely not a fan
of the Nadine and Milena style photo shoots, either. Only so much tit
sucking and going no further makes for a boring site. At least Nadine
shares some stray cooch shots. That to my mind makes her a lot sexier
than Milena for viewing purposes. Milena is frustrating. Valory on the
other hand in the right studio does share the gorgeous goods. I also
think she wins on overall looks by a good margin.
just my 2 cents!
Spermy
<O=~~~~~~~
|
|