On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:00:58 -0700, _ea <play@tennis.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:40:50 GMT, ksm@nospam.net.org.mil.nl (Keyser
>Sose) wrote:
>
>No, no, a thousand times no. There are a lot of us out here that
>follow your posts and appreciate them greatly. I know it's depressing
>and seems like a loosing battle but your efforts are appreciated by
>more people than you imagine. Certainly we don't post a thank you
>often enough but we are out here.
>
>For me the routine is get the headers, look for your latest post and
>get it started downloading a likely sample. While that's going on I
>high light the strings of posts that are obviously spam. I won't list
>them because they will change them then, but it's not hard to spot
>their pattern. Once highlighted, I delete them. Most of the time all
>that's left is your posts.
>
>There are a few others occasionally but you are the backbone. If you
>go away there won't me much of anything worth checking in for. In
>fact you did knock off for almost a week some time ago and the
>pickings were awfully thin and I for one was very glad when you came
>back.
Ditto.
|
|
')){kind=link}