Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.newstar
Subject: Re: In regards to kitty.
From: Lummox <running@muck.com>
References: <9lm7hcdjdnj8uvjcbtah0f7sg6ktc3gck0@4ax.com> <FqGdnb-1mISsd47EnZ2dnUU7-QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <5921d057$0$32276$c3e8da3$5da541ee@news.astraweb.com> <8v19ichmdbdpv5ubqsdd8p1pjue4b2rvnh@4ax.com>
Organization: Your Company
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <aONWA.27849$Kr.11385@fx04.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 04:52:22 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 1515
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3168064248
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.newstar:664
Cap'nDubby@nowhere.com wrote in
news:8v19ichmdbdpv5ubqsdd8p1pjue4b2rvnh@4ax.com:
>
>>
>>For info :-
>>sets 25- 38 are also missing the same 5 pics on each set I suspect if
>>you check.
>
> Who would do that? Why? Just to have something that nobody else has? I
> mean, thanks... but... oh, yeah, and thanks for bein' a jerk.
>
> Once again, yeah, I know I'm gettin' this stuff for free, too.
>
> Cap'n
If I remember correctly, Newstar would embed a customer-specific code in
several files from each set, which would enable them to identify who was
posting the files to Usenet. So, as this technique became known to the
posting community, people would simply refrain from posting the modified
files.
Thanks for your post. Kitty #2 is quite the little cutie-pie!
Lummox
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|