| 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail From: FerL <ferl@someplace.net>
 Subject: Re: Anyone have experience with H.265 codec? Just curious
 Newsgroups: alt.binaries.multimedia.vintage-film
 References: <NaqdndSNf_fi_LjKnZ2dnUU7-YvNnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <572591c5$0$22020$b1db1813$d2f06f9f@news.astraweb.com>
 <pefcibhjg4ohitcl1j45l1s0erc07ekhrv@4ax.com>
 User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508
 git://git.gnome.org/pan2)
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
 Lines: 17
 Message-ID: <QKOVy.8742$77.5810@fx38.iad>
 X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
 NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 20:27:28 UTC
 Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
 Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 20:27:28 GMT
 X-Received-Body-CRC: 3916291459
 X-Received-Bytes: 1728
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.multimedia.vintage-film:11135
 
 On Sun, 01 May 2016 13:33:55 -0400, daisys dude wrote:
 
 > On 01 May 2016 05:19:01 GMT, "fred-bloggs"
 > <fred-bloggs@hahahotmail.com> wrote:
 >
 >>On Sun, 01 May 2016 01:52:55 GMT, "Orlac888" <d3zmhow+
 >>0st11g@sharklasers.com> wrote
 >>
 >>h265/HEVC is more efficient than h264/AVC at very low bitrates and is
 >>currently being pushed for use on mobile telephones and 4K/UHD TVs. The
 >>main problem for us is the lack of hardware media players. The royalties
 >>for using the decompressor is 20x those for h264.
 >  and the colours are not true, on my system with my eyes. Results may
 > vary
 
 I haven't noticed any color issues and it's a great format for anyone
 with a dedicated HTPC. Amazing quality for such small files!
 
 | 
 
 |