mjello <non.compos@ment.is> wrote in news:XnsA5E9A10CCE219trastrastras@
69.16.179.27:
> http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/apr/13/ted-cruz-texas-ban-sex-
> toys-case-2007
>
> per Ted Cruz as solicitor general of Texas in 1307, "There is no
> substantive due-process right to stimulate one's genitals for non-
> medical purposes unrelated to procreation or outside of an
interpersonal
> relationship."
>
> per Ted Cruz, the state of Texas has a substantive interest in making
> sure you don't masturbate unless it's to make a baby (is Texas clear on
> where babies come from?)
>
> trying to follow this... if you live in Texas you have to drive to a
> different state to jerk off?
>
> but the Constitution guarantees that you and the rest of your milita
can
> defend yourselves by walking down my street with loaded semi-automatics
>
> just don't masturbate while you're doing it; in fact, it's best if you
> don't even look at the barrel of your weapon
>
>
> mjello
A bit lengthy, but it does go along nicely with the Cruz state of mind.
D.w?
Despite being rebuffed by voters in Mississippi and Colorado, proponents
states like Ohio and Oklahoma that would give zygotes the same rights as
American citizens. These bills would not only criminalize abortion in all
circumstances, they would also outlaw common forms of contraception, as
well as in vitro fertilization.
To poke fun at the absurdity of the measure, Oklahoma state Sen.
Senate Bill 1433 that really pushed her over the edge. The bill sought to
even implanted in the womb, and offers full legal protection to those
every stage of development (has) all the rights, privileges, and
immunities available to other persons, citizens, and residents of this
Johnson submitted an amendment of her own to the bill, which would have
added the language,
However, any action in which a man ejaculates or otherwise deposits semen
action against an unborn child.
sex, anal sex, and masturbation. Were it not a satirical bill, it would
almost certainly be deemed unconstitutional.
To prove that her amendment was in jest, Johnson voted with her
colleagues to table it later in the day. But it does illustrate a serious
point: only about half of fertilized eggs develop into a pregnancy. If
Republican lawmakers are willing to declare every cluster of cells with
the potential to become a fetus a person, why stop at fertilized eggs?
Why not sperm as well?
To protest the inherent sexism of the personhood bill, another Democratic
senator attempted to add an amendment that would require the father of
housing, and other expenses while she is pregnant.
|
|