On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 22:49:54 GMT, mjello <non.compos@ment.is> wrote:
>http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/apr/13/ted-cruz-texas-ban-sex-
>toys-case-2007
>
>per Ted Cruz as solicitor general of Texas in 1307, "There is no
>substantive due-process right to stimulate one's genitals for non-
>medical purposes unrelated to procreation or outside of an interpersonal
>relationship."
>
>per Ted Cruz, the state of Texas has a substantive interest in making
>sure you don't masturbate unless it's to make a baby (is Texas clear on
>where babies come from?)
>
>trying to follow this... if you live in Texas you have to drive to a
>different state to jerk off?
>
>but the Constitution guarantees that you and the rest of your milita can
>defend yourselves by walking down my street with loaded semi-automatics
>
>just don't masturbate while you're doing it; in fact, it's best if you
>don't even look at the barrel of your weapon
>
>
>mjello
He reminds me of a brother in law and not fondly. Oddly he too is from
texas...
EG.
|
|