On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 03:56:22 GMT, "J.J. Flash" <yas@yas.yas> wrote:
>Old Geek <eldergeekenator@gmail.com> wrote in
>news:cj9rqah9osfk8df0gu4e0vqm5ljpqutpr5@4ax.com:
>
>> Valid option.
>> Perhaps it would be better to ask your question in
>> alt.usenet.offline-reader.forte-agent or forte.private.cafe
>
>Then here's a more formal statement of it.
>
>/quote/
>Part of Todays crop:
>
>From:
>"<<< bGuDn_8Wdj >>>" <_btant2shi@aqsmhlq_nf.com>
>"<<< bGuDn_8Wdj >>>" <_btant2shi@aqsmhlq_nf.com>
>"<<< L6_Sy5W3iJ >>>" <4v1fk4hazk@yvpadqm5kl.com>
>"<<< lTXR3tbuo2 >>>" <tcn3avci_p@p2y_vfh1mf.com>
>"<<< ou1qaMXDiW >>>" <rk7zmdxbit@fuilyulstd.com>
>"<<< Rwe72FwZ11 >>>" <77517ndkeg@za1r6x8ao4.com>
>"<<< tf54YNaiZ4 >>>" <_ogacubou6@xekbrtnimr.com>
>
>As you can see they roll the poster name with every posting.
>/quote/
>
>-----
>The patterns that repeat in each example are:
>
>"<<<[softspace][10 random alphanumerics][softspace]>>>"
>[softspace]
><[10 random alphanumerics]@[10 random alphanumerics].com>
>
>The question is whether a regex for [10 random alphanumerics] in the
>third line (twice) will also knock out any posts you do want to see. Try
>it for a while with a second instance of Agent. Or just look at the
>likely half dozen or so From nyms you do care about.
Thank You both for the help. I will dig a bit more. I just thought I
would ask here as there are some very knowledgable folks about
filters. I am not so I thought I might be missing something obvious.
;-)
|
|