Old Geek <eldergeekenator@gmail.com> wrote in
news:cj9rqah9osfk8df0gu4e0vqm5ljpqutpr5@4ax.com:
> Valid option.
> Perhaps it would be better to ask your question in
> alt.usenet.offline-reader.forte-agent or forte.private.cafe
Then here's a more formal statement of it.
/quote/
Part of Todays crop:
From:
"<<< bGuDn_8Wdj >>>" <_btant2shi@aqsmhlq_nf.com>
"<<< bGuDn_8Wdj >>>" <_btant2shi@aqsmhlq_nf.com>
"<<< L6_Sy5W3iJ >>>" <4v1fk4hazk@yvpadqm5kl.com>
"<<< lTXR3tbuo2 >>>" <tcn3avci_p@p2y_vfh1mf.com>
"<<< ou1qaMXDiW >>>" <rk7zmdxbit@fuilyulstd.com>
"<<< Rwe72FwZ11 >>>" <77517ndkeg@za1r6x8ao4.com>
"<<< tf54YNaiZ4 >>>" <_ogacubou6@xekbrtnimr.com>
As you can see they roll the poster name with every posting.
/quote/
-----
The patterns that repeat in each example are:
"<<<[softspace][10 random alphanumerics][softspace]>>>"
[softspace]
<[10 random alphanumerics]@[10 random alphanumerics].com>
The question is whether a regex for [10 random alphanumerics] in the
third line (twice) will also knock out any posts you do want to see. Try
it for a while with a second instance of Agent. Or just look at the
likely half dozen or so From nyms you do care about.
|
|