On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:45:37 -0500, Old Geek
<eldergeekenator@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:39:13 -0500, C_Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>ChinaFan was kind enough to alert abenc as to an update on the latest
>>spammer filter.
>>
>>
>>On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:45:25 -0700, ChinaFan
>><ChinaFan@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>Message-ID:=%{<[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?@[0-9a-z][0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?\.com>}
>>>
>>>Spammer is now varying a little more what follows the "@".
>>
>>
>>Note filter is for Agent
>>
>>Note NO Carriage Returns, filter must be on one line.
>
>Thanks, that works quite well.
>
>EG.
Glad to see you back EG, hope you had a great trip !
|
|