alt.binaries.multimedia.erotica.amateurPrev. Next
Re: New spammer filter? Forte - www.forteinc.com
dude (dude@noaddressatall.com) 2014/10/22 16:39

Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border2.newsrouter.astraweb.com!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!enother.net!enother.net!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx17.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dude <dude@noaddressatall.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.multimedia.erotica.amateur
Subject: Re: New spammer filter?
Message-ID: <r7cg4alvftt6corj7hm76rrdarniutug0l@4ax.com>
References: <gmu64atahlkjm1juccdmh974gpbqevoui6@4ax.com> <7oa74a5bon90596eklnid87udlrcobimnl@4ax.com> <lse84ah4ou782ano8ee7cjmdiufmijc8ur@4ax.com> <80h84a5fvdunfu2n4iu487jnopdmhsuo5q@4ax.com> <e9q94atds25k7ktmhvelbdo96h8qb6km69@4ax.com> <5kr94a5u16u0utajq8n7modlj7i043if21@4ax.com> <h26a4ahg0j481232k96e9hvhgakl37ueut@4ax.com> <6uoa4a12oev3m8ec5bvkc40g11gdsj9hnb@4ax.com> <h9hd4a9cmri2btpre2gme4vdh1gk959l5n@4ax.com> <s9hf4atdonlvrm2n2sub4majmn79k72vls@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 117
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:39:14 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 4686
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3527575979
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.multimedia.erotica.amateur:1224

On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:08:59 -0500, C_Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote:

>On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:46:02 -0400, dude <dude@noaddressatall.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:37:58 -0400, dude <dude@noaddressatall.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:13:55 -0500, C_Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 07:15:32 -0400, dude <dude@noaddressatall.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 06:55:05 -0400, dude <dude@noaddressatall.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 18:09:19 -0500, Old Geek
>>>>>><eldergeekenator@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 17:31:13 -0500, C_Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 08:18:20 -0400, dude <dude@noaddressatall.com>
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 04:50:36 -0400, dude <dude@noaddressatall.com>
>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Thumper, in some other groups, is that server.  I adjusted the filter
>>>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: {<*@news.astraweb.com>}  and not Author: Thumper
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Okay, what are people using to get rid of the latest spam nut?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I'm going to try
>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: {<*@news.astraweb.com>}
>>>>>>>>> in Agent 7.
>>>>>>>>>>Anyone else using this filter or do you have something else/better.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Going with the Thumper mod.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That should work, but remember Cervante posts from astra and so does
>>>>>>>TG.
>>>>>>>Message ID's for C don't include the @news.astraweb.com, TGs do.
>>>>>>>That makes it a tough one to devise...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>EG.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Is there an "or" condition that can be used?  like
>>>>>> ...and not Author: Thumper or TG
>>>>>>or can commas be used to exclude  two different authors?
>>>>>
>>>>>It seems that another poster, SL, in a different newsgroup uses the
>>>>>same message IDs.   Hope someone can figure out  a good filter.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Try two,  and not Author:  xxx
>>>>
>>>>one statement for each.
>>>>no commas necessary
>>> To be sure I understand, are you saying make one filter like
>>>
>>>Message-ID: {<*@news.astraweb.com>}  and not Author: Thumper and not
>>>Author: SL
>>>or are you saying make two filters,
>>>
>>>Message-ID: {<*@news.astraweb.com>}  and not Author: Thumper
>>>
>>>Message-ID: {<*@news.astraweb.com>}  and not Author: SL
>>>?
>>>
>>>Hope I'm not being dense.  I just want to clearly understand.
>>
>>
>>Okay, I just tried
>>
>>Message-ID: {<*@news.astraweb.com>}  and not Author: Thumper and not
>>Author: SL
>
>Filter looks good.
>>
>>and it worked letting SL through.  I don't know if Thumper hasn't
>>posted or if it's deleting new headers from him yet.
>
>
>Thumper posts sporadically, you can reload this group:
>alt.binaries.multimedia.erotica.asian
>
>and check.  Last post from Thumper there was on 10/14/14
>
>
>Most recent posts from Thumper seem to be in:
>
>alt.binaries.multimedia.nospam.erotica
>alt.binaries.nospam.multimedia.erotica
>
>on 10/19


I just reloaded
alt.binaries.nospam.multimedia.facials
(another one that Thumper posts in and the filter I'm using now is
working(letting Thumper through). See below.

Message-ID: {<*@news.astraweb.com>}  and not Author: Thumper and not
Author: SL

So, it seems both my filter and

Message-ID: {<*@news.astraweb.com>}  and not Author: (Thumper or
cervante)

work--even though the filter without conditions shouldn't filter
Cervante anyway.

Follow-ups:123456789101112131415161718
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite