On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 06:55:20 -0500, Opoponax
<opoponaxNOSPAM@hushmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 22:41:10 +1100, John Smith<JS@tardis.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 05:40:11 -0500, Opoponax
>><opoponaxNOSPAM@hushmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:04:22 +1100, John Smith<JS@tardis.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Mine is ntsc, COM's is pal.
>>>>
>>>>John
>>>
>>>The info says COM's DVD9 is PAL, I still don't know if this is the
>>>correct file or not since it's a DVD5 (not a 9 as per the info)
>>>
>>>-Opoponax
>>>Wolf! Right here and now!
>>
>>No, the info image says the source is a DVD9 PAL. In the top right
>>hand corner it says the post is a DVD5 +R.
>>
>>John
>
>I checked and you're correct. Now I'm puzzled as to everything, COM
>mentioned he was going to post a DVD9. A DVD5 is great, assuming this
>is the right file.
>
>-Opoponax
>Wolf! Right here and now!
Sorry for the delay, but I was in a hurry yesterday.
John is right and it was a mistake of me by overlooking the fact that
by deleteing the extras, it became a dvd5. I'm sorry for that
confusion.
COM
|
|