On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 16:10:38 -0500, "I.Me.Mine" <i.me@mine.org> wrote:
>COM@solitaire.net wrote:
>
>> On 22 Jun 2013 13:45:00 GMT, Moz <Moz@doodooface.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Com... might I ask why this is passworded? We don't normally do
>>>that in these groups. There is no explanation that I can find of
>>>what this is or why it has a password. Maybe I'm getting old (a
>>>fact :)) and cranky but this doesn't seem right to me.
>>>
>>>
>>>Cheers... Moz
>>
>> This is a special post and if you had been following the posts
>> here, you would know.
>>
>> I'm spending a lot of works on y rips/posts and depending on
>> responsers (only 2 are taking their time to respond) I don't see
>> any reasons to post for lurkers anymore. So if people are
>> interested in my posts, they better say so.
>>
>> You critiised me in apop for no reason. I had a legit question
>> and no critisism. I believed you knew me better.
>>
>> If Obelix had been living, I would have called him and discussed
>> posting PW'd posts and lsiten to what he wuld have to say.
>>
>> Obelix didn't like the non-response attitude. If you like to
>> download my intends, you should reply.
>>
>> Hope our disagreements not will "kill" our relationship.
>>
>> COM
>>
>
>Com, I understand the desire for feedback from posters and lurkers
>alike. I appreciated the same when I was actively posting.
>However your statement that you don't see any reason to post for
>lurkers anymore troubles me. I was a lurker long before I was a
>poster. Some people just prefer to stay in the shadows and not
>call attention to themselves. I am not in favor of this trend of
>closed groups or inner circles.
>
>Just my opinion.
I appreciate your opinion.
Please read my reply to Moz.
COM
>
|
|