On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 05:42:27 +0000, ridesaway@bloodymorningafter.org wrote,
>On 09 Nov 2008 04:37:15 GMT, Ruby Tuesday <once@theWall> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 04:27:34 +0000, ridesaway@bloodymorningafter.org wrote,
>>>
>>>"...long missing sets 169 & 171"?
>>>
>>>Long missing? Really? Mine are 'compleat' per n@@dles csv,
>>>minus na-169-39tn.jpg. A post of the same will be forthcoming.
>>>
>>>Naturally, my posts will be dubbed as being of dubious origin
>>>by some, and will be scrutinised, reworked, folded, spindled,
>>>and mutilated (and undoubtedly recataloged into a new csv which
>>>proclaims them to be part of an entirely unrelated site).
>>>
>>><sigh>
>>>
>>>--
>>>ots
>>
>><BG> Thanks for a good laugh and lifting my spirits. And more thanks for the
>>original sets.
>>
>>RT
>
>AFAIK, we now have identical miss/wrong lists. I have:
>
> 7 missing
> 293 wrong size
> 1 wrong crc
> --------------------
> 301 total miss/wrong
>
>LMK if these numbers appear to differ from yours...
>
>--
>ots
We do indeed differ. My miss_wrong stands at 270 wrong size. I can save you
the trouble of hunting through past posts for the 31 files if you post your
miss/wrong for me. I'll rar up a package for you.
Ruby Tuesday
|
|