On 09 Nov 2008 04:37:15 GMT, Ruby Tuesday <once@theWall> wrote:
>On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 04:27:34 +0000, ridesaway@bloodymorningafter.org wrote,
>>
>>"...long missing sets 169 & 171"?
>>
>>Long missing? Really? Mine are 'compleat' per n@@dles csv,
>>minus na-169-39tn.jpg. A post of the same will be forthcoming.
>>
>>Naturally, my posts will be dubbed as being of dubious origin
>>by some, and will be scrutinised, reworked, folded, spindled,
>>and mutilated (and undoubtedly recataloged into a new csv which
>>proclaims them to be part of an entirely unrelated site).
>>
>><sigh>
>>
>>--
>>ots
>
><BG> Thanks for a good laugh and lifting my spirits. And more thanks for the
>original sets.
>
>RT
AFAIK, we now have identical miss/wrong lists. I have:
7 missing
293 wrong size
1 wrong crc
--------------------
301 total miss/wrong
LMK if these numbers appear to differ from yours...
--
ots
|
|