On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:41:25 +0000, one tin soldier wrote:
>Fallen Angels still confuses me. I would *like* to have
>one complete set, but which reflects completion against
>both CD's and n@@dles' CSVs, but have not yet put it all
>together to see what may be lacking. (As you are aware,
>there is some discrepancy between the two.)
I should have images that match both csv's. Both are correct really, as
the site reissued a few pix to get the logo off the model's face. N@@dles
indexed the better looking of the two, while CD indexed the only one
available at the time.
>What image do you lack from Fallen Angels?
fa-25a-29.jpg
>I lack las-019-088.jpg from Assorties and lsp-001-113.jpg
>from Little Pirates.
Got them coming.
>>Lolitas on Holiday was totally misnamed, but otherwise contained good
>>images. I believe it was incomplete.
>
>It was. For whatever reason, I lack 113 images from LoH.
Junked up, as I recall, with garbage after the jpg image on account of a
website disk crash and attempted recovery.
>I've no idea which group would be appropriate for requesting
>LoH fills, and I know better than to ask which group <bfg>.
Why not drop your miss_wrong in the midst of the hurricane?
|
|