Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Old Geek <eldergeekenator@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.homeporn
Subject: Re: pix looking for a home 01 file - "amateurs01.jpg" yEnc (0/1)
Message-ID: <r1caeaphmq90gom10lo6dj4vp9lqkppaib@4ax.com>
References: <VXyEw.2503146$Rp.1469294@fx23.iad>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 17
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 18:37:51 -0600
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3535477680
X-Received-Bytes: 1595
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.homeporn:102
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 03:54:29 GMT, comet@come.com (Haley) wrote:
>
>a few of the pictures I liked on
> fritchy, antiq, phun, kitty-kats, and other "forums"
>about 20% are dickwork, the remainder are not - hot chicks, interesting poses/expressions/situations, things that surprised me...
>
>a few would make more sense if you knew the stories that went with them (she's carefully putting on her make-up because she's going to get her face pissed on... WTF?), but only a few
>
>it's probably the case that some of the girls are professional amateurs and a few of the pix are logo-ed, but hotness won out
>
>LMK if there's any interest in this little collection.
Thank you.
Nice set of pix.
EG.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.homeporn/102h', 'Re: pix looking for a home 01 file - "amateurs01.jpg" yEnc (0/1)')){kind=link}