Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!pullnews.sonic-news.com!news.astraweb.com!border1.newsrouter.astraweb.com!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!208.90.169.39!news.alt.net
From: Sharon Williams <no@email.spam>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.h.lolicon
Subject: Good news for those who want 3D images
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:03:50 +0100
Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <2clj8l.ic4.17.1@news.alt.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.02.00-gb
X-ICQ: 543516788
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.h.lolicon:85
I have now found out that the defitinion of a child porn pseudoimage
does not include 3D computer generated images, in fact it means the use
of the real picture of a child, and its modification to make it look
like it is porn.
Using Photoshop to impose the head of a child over the body of an adult
porn actress would fit this definition and be illegal.
I am always over cautions, I have doubled checked these facts, and
found the whole child porn law on the internet, so I am pretty sure
about this.
I will have a look under the bed see if I find anything 3D.
|
|