Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: C_Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.erotica.nospam.creampie
Subject: Re: Girlfriend Allison Sexy & NEW! - 82122.jpg <-- Filter for the spam <-- Update
Organization: CP Creatorz
Reply-To: cum-one@cum-all.org
Message-ID: <5bvhjah5da741p9dppcn7696adnd144otr@4ax.com>
References: <a481.766d.1f4@o373m1.com> <ot65jah7nk0s6u41a9jr5u9821up3r50ht@4ax.com> <s2hfja9hg539qk38jcp8l0iijubcdn9mei@4ax.com> <8gjgjape12r57kek5p17208vkcrgg19sju@4ax.com> <k5vhja5gn5vq6fklt50sgc3qvs6jm5jav8@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.00.32.1200
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 44
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:12:07 -0500
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1467438511
X-Received-Bytes: 2449
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.erotica.nospam.creampie:503
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:08:22 -0500, C_Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote:
>On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:45:25 -0700, ChinaFan
><ChinaFan@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:57:35 -0500, C_Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 19:01:13 +0100, fuck@what.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 19 Apr 15 08:25:17 -0700, Garvy <w5gf10@po373m1.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>What part opf alt.binaries.erotica.NOSPAM.CREAMPIE don't you
>>>>understand ?
>>>>
>>>>Where's the creampie and why are you spamming ?
>>>
>>>
>>>Here's a kill filter written by ChinaFan that will rid you of the spam
>>>
>>>Message-ID:
>>>=%{<[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?@[a-z][a-z][a-z][a-z][a-z]\.com>}
>>>
>>>(Must be on one line, no carriage returns)
>>>
>>>Filter works in Agent 7, YMMV.
>>>
>>>Spammers don't read usenet.
>>
>>Message-ID:
>>=%{<[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?@[0-9a-z][0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?\.com>}
>>
>>Spammer is now varying a little more what follows the "@".
>
>
>Thank you CF, you're the best !
>
>B^]]
PS
Think the previous filter was getting >95%+ of the spams.
Again, great work, you're the bestest ! :-)
|
|
){kind=link}